What becomes of theory when it ceases to comment and begins to conjure?
The CCRU would tell us it becomes hyperstition: the idea that makes itself real, the spell that enters circulation disguised as theory, infecting the circuits of belief until belief itself becomes infrastructure.
Are the members of the CCRU sorcerers? If so, should we regard them as houngans or bokors? Are their theory-fictions spells?
The group explicitly described its work as âhyperstitionâ and âtheory-fictionâ: concepts that blur the boundary between philosophy, science fiction, and occult ritual. They often styled themselves less as scholars than as conduits for outside forces: jungle rhythms, numogrammatic entities. In a sense, then, yes: they framed their practices as sorcery. Their âspellsâ were written as essays, communiquĂŠs, fragments. But these writings were designed to propagate, to spread virally, to âdo thingsâ rather than merely describe. In that sense, CCRUâs writings are absolutely spells: sigils in textual form, engineered to infect the reader and reprogram the future.
To read CCRU is often to undergo a kind of initiation. Like Ishmael Reedâs Mumbo Jumbo, their texts are written in the mode of enchantment: nonlinear, mythic, contagious. They cultivate confusion not as a failure of clarity but as a technique â an opening for other agencies to slip in and act through the writing.
Yet it often seems like the magic practiced here is the magic of the colonizer. âCcru uses and is used by Hyperstition,â says the group, âto colonize the future, traffic with the virtual, and continually reinvent itselfâ (CCRU Writings 1997-2003, p. 12). The register here is neither priestly nor pedagogical, but bokor-like. Not houngans sustaining community, but sorcerers who cut deals with entities, riding the dangerous edge where control and contagion blur.
Reed saw clearly how colonizers fear the vitality of the colonized, branding it nonsense â mumbo jumbo â while secretly dreading and desiring its power. His novel reminds us: Jes Grew was already here, a virus of joy and dance, a counter-language that undermined empire.
CCRUâs ânumbo-jumbo,â meanwhile, is Mumbo Jumboâs shadow twin. Where Jes Grew is insurgent, collective, irreducibly black, CCRUâs hyperstitional sorcery veers toward the appropriative and the machinic: coded to âcolonize the futureâ rather than decolonize the present. If Jes Grew is jazz as contagion, CCRUâs numbo-jumbo is jungle reframed as algorithmic virus. One blooms from the oppressed; the other traffics in the occult economies of empire.
So we read them carefully. Not to dismiss, but to discern: how much of their sorcery is truly liberatory, and how much is a glamour cast by the very forces it pretends to resist? Bokor-scribes, traffickers in theory-fiction, CCRU remind us that not all spells are equal. Some liberate; others bind. Some open the future; others colonize it.
Much of this, I suspect, is to be credited to Land. Given what becomes of him, Iâm wary.
CCRU acknowledge as an influence on their cosmology William Gibsonâs Sprawl trilogy. Gibsonâs trilogy, says the group, âspreads voodoo into the digital economyâ (CCRU Writings 1997-2003, p. 10).
âNumbo-jumboâ is one of the groupâs hyperstitions. Propagated through their writings, it attracts, it bends the line between fiction and reality, invoking futures into being through text, rhythm, and affect.
Connections form between Afrofuturism and what the group refers to as âNeolemurian sorcery.â
Land, with his necro-libidinal economics, was the loudest in this register. His sorcery traffics in acceleration, meltdown, colonization of time itself. Easy enough, then, to point accusingly and declare Land alone the bokor of the bunch. But what of the others? Wasnât Fisher caught, spellbound, in circuits of melancholy and collective desire? And Plantâs weaving of zeroes and ones: is that not also a kind of spell, a textual conjuring of feminine technicity? To read their theory-fictions is to be drawn into ritual spaces where clarity blurs into incantation.
In contrast, I hold fast to Mumbo Jumbo. Reedâs novel spins an alternative mythos: Jes Grew, the dancing epidemic of Black culture, a contagion of joy, rhythm, and refusal, pitted against the Atonists who would lock the world into stone. Reedâs satire insists that the true sorcery belongs not to the colonizer but to the peopleâs improvisations, to Jes Grewâs unruly proliferation.
Set against the latter, CCRUâs numbo-jumbo reveals its doubleness. As hyperstition, it propagates, it attracts. It wants to be contagious. But what does it spread? Is it Jes Grewâs liberatory dance, or Landâs necromantic colonization of futures? That undecidability is its pharmakon: its poison and its cure.
For me, the task is to discern which. To let Jes Grewâs laughter and Reedâs satire remind us: the future doesnât belong to those who colonize it, but to those who dance it otherwise.


